Fair enough. We know who we're talking about.
I was quoting the George Morris Centre study specifically, and it is very easy to compare the levels of investment. Either you have investment or you don't. Yes, we do have investment in the prairie provinces, but it is nowhere near the level it should be, and this is specifically because of the monopoly. I can give you an example with malting barley especially.
In the west, we should be the malting barley capital of North America, due to the economics. The only reason we're not is that maltsters need to be able to contract directly with the producer to get the kind of specs they need. I believe it was either in 2004 or 2005 that we saw about $400 million worth of malting investment in the northern tier states, even though there was a $35 to $40 a tonne advantage to malting that barley in Canada. The reason it went south was the monopoly.
Mr. Chairman.