Yes. Again, talking about SRM, we wanted to put in an SRM ban that was similar to the ban in the United States because our classifications are the same. At one time we believed that was to be the case. Unfortunately, not only did we move ahead of them more quickly but we also imposed a much longer list than what they were proposing.
Secondly, yes, the devil's in the details. It has raised costs considerably that we took this comprehensive approach and also that it was interpreted this way. It's making it very difficult. And part of that $160 is because of that.