Yes, I had a comment on that. I think there are some ways we can save.
I know the Province of Saskatchewan now does its own administration of AgriStability, and it has helped tremendously. I think you have people who understand the problems that are indigenous to Saskatchewan, so that's been helpful.
An idea that I think is being floated around with AgriStability is where you'd have a program that is current in the year in which have a production or price issue, or whatever it is. I think you could do it more simply than it is being done now. Most farmers realize that it doesn't matter whether you sell your cattle in the fall or you harvest in the fall, because you know exactly what kind of year you've had.
If you do your income on an accrual basis, which is what AgriStability does, as it always puts it back to the accrual system, you'd be able to hone in on what the problems are. You wouldn't have to put it off a year, or a year and a half, to get payments; the government would know where they're at and so would the producers. I think it could be made a lot simplier and a lot cheaper.
It costs us about $1,500 a year to do AgriStability, and we've had one payment in the last 30 years. AgriStability wasn't always there, but through all the programs that's all we've had.