Right, and I think it's fundamental because from a trade action point of view, certainly if the federal government were to engage in a program that insured profitability, that would be trade actionable, because it certainly looks like a direct government subsidy going to farmers, whereas if the farmer is insuring himself against what he can sell his product for, regardless of what his input costs are, then that's an insurance-based program.
On December 15th, 2011. See this statement in context.