Thank you for the question.
From our perspective, the bill is not an appropriate way to address the issues of concern. Biosecurity measures or the amendment you're speaking about, through which the bill would apply to not only those without lawful authority but also to those who do have an excuse to be on the farm, might be an improvement, because as we heard in the previous panel, the biosecurity risks are typically greatest from activities and practices on the farm as opposed to those coming from the outside.
However, the bigger question really is about addressing trespassing and addressing concern about protest activities. This could be alleviated perhaps through public government proactive inspection, a public oversight mechanism that doesn't rely on industry managing their own oversight but that actually has public reporting and accountability to citizens.