One of them is just what I indicated. There are those individuals with whom we believe there is a problem. If they get a dangerous offender designation and then they are subsequently released into the public and they then don't comply, the way the law is set up it becomes very difficult. They basically have to start all over again, and as you may know, this is a very time-consuming, difficult, expensive operation that crown attorneys are sometimes reluctant to pursue.
So that is very much a concern that I believe is being addressed. It is also one of the reasons why in Bill C-27, since the Johnson case, which I'm sure you're familiar with, we've actually seen a reduction in the number of attempts to designate individuals as dangerous offenders. That reduction, I believe, was a direct result of the Johnson decision. We are attempting to clarify that as well, and I think that would be helpful and would be welcomed by crown attorneys.
Mr. Hoover, I believe, has something else that he might be able to add.
Are we out of time on this, Mr. Chair?