As I indicated in my previous answer, we gave Mr. Pickard as much time as he required to provide his part of the story in oral testimony and invited him to continue to engage with us as he was able to provide more information. He did so with a number of emails, as I previously indicated.
Two more facts are also important.
One is that in the course of that, he was not able to corroborate or substantiate his testimony with written documents. I think he provided that explanation also in his testimony.
With respect to our subsequent steps in the review we have been undertaking, he would not be aware of all of the work we have been doing, including engaging in over 40 of our own interviews with various parties, both within government and outside of government, to try to understand and to try to corroborate the seriousness of the allegations he has been making and to find a way forward as part of our ongoing review.