I don't know about all the rules that applied, but to the extent that I've gone through a lot of the material that your committee looked at, I think there was a rule that prohibited that, and it should not have happened. I would argue it's not just a question of hindsight. If it was looked at at the time—where it was going, the way it was transmitted, the authority that was obtained to do that—I think they violated a rule, so no, I don't think it should have happened, if I understand the rule correctly.
On May 3rd, 2024. See this statement in context.