It does, and I also don't think it's important to name individuals at a particular point in time.
I would argue, as I tried to say at the beginning, that it's the system writ large, from the very top to the very bottom, that wasn't taking these things as seriously as it should have. I think you can argue that individuals within that system might have been a bit more enthusiastic in enforcing the rules, but I think this is one of those cases in which a great deal of the responsibility can be shared. I know it drives many parliamentarians to distraction when it's impossible to identify an individual in the public service who did something wrong, but in this case I really do think it's the DSO on up. Everybody was operating in an environment in which, had they thought differently, the outcome would have been different.
Also, there were a lot of protections written into our system, the labour relations system, the charter and whatnot, and all of these things slowed down the process that your colleague Mr. Cooper referred to. I'm not saying it's a good thing, but they're there, and to the extent that we want to put them into place all the time, they do have an impact.