Thank you for sharing your perspective on that. I think this is very significant and inspiring. I want to share with you my strong support for the people who are protesting and for their calls for freedom, for justice and for protection of their fundamental human rights. Obviously, a tragic incident sparked this. I think it is quite significant that we see how the deaths of Uighurs have sparked this protest movement, which includes people all across China. It's very significant.
I want to ask about having a more coordinated approach among like-minded allies when it comes both to preventing the importation of products made from forced labour and to trying to prevent investment in companies that are involved in forced labour.
Professor Murphy made the point that products are likely to end up in the countries that have the weakest laws. Maybe the same is true for investment, and that we see investment from countries with the weakest laws. With that in mind, wouldn't it make sense for a group of like-minded countries to get together and say that we're going to have the same rules in place, that we're going to have a coordinated approach and we're going to have the same standards?
Wouldn't that actually make it a lot easier for enforcement as well as a lot easier for businesses? They would be able to apply one standard across all the countries they operate in, and no country would be providing a safe haven. Does that coordinated approach make sense? Why hasn't it happened?
Professor Murphy, maybe we'll start with you. I have very little time, but we'll try to get in as many people as we can.