Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Ms. Dabrusin, for the question.
There is already language in the bill that clarifies that when a social media user is an affiliate—i.e., when they have a relationship with a social media company—they do not benefit from the exclusion. That is already part of the bill.
Based on what I understand Mr. Manly to be proposing, it is that he's proposing to simply clarify that the opposite is true—to explicitly state that when an affiliate is broadcasting, they don't benefit from the exception.
The government's perspective would be that this is already implicit in the current bill and therefore that this amendment would simply be stating the opposite reading.
Those would be my thoughts on it, Mr. Chair.