Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I have been made aware of a letter from the Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association. it is an industry organization that you are probably familiar with, representing companies such as Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Unilever, etc. In that letter, they state their disagreement with the definition of "toxic" in the Act, as if that definition was incorrect.
Is the definition of what should be included or not, or of what should be considered as a toxic substance, an important issue for environmentalists, industry or even the department?