The problem with the use of the word “communities” is that this can very much broaden to include somebody who may not be affected by anything in Bill C-288 suddenly having access to a just transition fund, and that's certainly not the intention.
Using the word “workers” may have more specific relevance. This person was affected; their job was removed; and the company is looking to transition to another form of energy production, manufacturing, or something. That might make more sense, but I would hesitate to use “communities”. That really broadens it as to who is affected. It could go on and on, and that's not the intention of the amendment.