As I've mentioned before, we acknowledge that in the next several years we're going to have to start to look at what the next version will be in terms of the national parks systems plan, but currently we are focused on getting the areas in the unrepresented ones. In terms of our marine systems plan, as I mentioned, we have only five of 29 represented, so we will continue to work on that plan.
I do want to stress that it is not just a question of percentages. It is a question of where these places are located.
A national park reserve in the south Okanagan would add about 0.001 to the target, yet it is incredibly rich in terms of biological diversity, so it's important in these systems plans that we look at what we are contributing to a target and, as Kevin said, that we use that to drive us to get new areas. However, when we are designing them, part of the future and current plan is to look at key areas, to make sure that they're representative or that important bird habitats and things like that are effectively and equitably managed and well connected. It's that notion of connecting these protected areas that is really essential.
Again, I'm sure you'll be hearing about that on Thursday and we'll be addressing that through our work.