Yes. Thank you very much.
My analysis assumes that everything Mr. van Koeverden would say about climate change is true. It accepts the proposition that there is anthropomorphic climate change and that the situation is as has been widely suggested. I'm not suggesting anything to the contrary. The point is this: If we think that is true, if this is really an emergency and if the planet is actually burning, then the things you are suggesting are wholly inadequate, which means that maybe you don't believe it yourselves.
I'll use the analogy of a burning house. Your house is burning down and you have no fire department, no hose, no water. You grab your neighbour's cup of coffee and you throw it on the fire because it's wet. You say, “Well, I'm doing something about it.” No, you're not. You're doing nothing about it. All of these will have no effect because Canada is not the source of carbon emissions. Yes, it's 1.5%, but as I alluded to earlier, the main sources of carbon emissions are other countries with big populations and lots of coal and no restrictions in international regimes like the Paris Agreement.
If you're serious about this, then you need to find a different path to find an actual solution to the actual problem you're claiming exists.