Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to follow up on that, if I could.
I'm looking at a graph I used earlier. Canadian oil sands have an emissions intensity, on average, of about 174 kilograms of CO2 per barrel. In Mexico, Cantarell, for example, has 40 kilograms per barrel CO2 emissions.
If we were to take the exact same number of barrels away from the oil sands, if we were to shift all of that production of crude oil to Mexico and reduce the average emissions intensity per barrel by that amount, how can every witness on the committee today agree that emissions would go up, if the most emissions-intensive barrels of oil—and I'm just talking about the oil sands here—were replaced by lower emitting barrels? Could somebody please explain that to me?