Mr. Chair, I have a point of order.
I was looking back to the motion for this study, and I do not understand the relevance of some of these questions to what our study is specifically about, which is the “environment and climate impacts related to the Canadian financial system, including...current practices in this sector”—having to do with environment and climate impacts and—“analysis of regulatory and legislative mechanisms” that we could put in place “to ensure its financial regime aligns with the Paris Agreement and thus, promote the reduction of inherent risks, namely physical and transition risks”.
I don't see Mr. Mazier's line of questioning being at all consistent with what our study is about.