Thanks for the question.
Before I answer, I just want to congratulate you on the birth of your baby since we were last together in committee here.
With respect to the question, we have undertaken a thorough review of our communication procedures and protocols across the whole company, not just those specific to Kearl. We learned that we had very robust and consistent protocols and procedures in place for what I would describe as emergency notifications to communities and surrounding neighbours—regulatory requirements and all of those appropriate notifications.
When it came to other incidents, we found some inconsistencies and some clear gaps related to communities.
Since we last met here, we have been internalizing those learnings and we're now looking for how we can enhance them. As part of that, we have put in place more consistent protocols. We have elevated, if you will, or expanded the types of information we would share with communities. We're obviously demonstrating that with the Kearl incident.
As it relates to Kearl, in our most recent quarterly meetings we've had with each of the communities, we've been sharing those enhanced protocols, seeking feedback from them and ensuring that they meet the communities' expectations as we go forward.
I feel quite good about the steps we've taken. Again, we're going to continue to work with the communities to ensure these steps meet their requirements.