Yes, I am indeed, and I do thank Mr. Barrett for his reading of it, because exactly the point I am making is that the subamendment, by deleting that text from Mr. Fergus's amendment completely confounds the whole sense of the work we are trying to do here, as cobbled together as it is.
I certainly object to this subamendment. It shows Mr. Barrett's intention not to do the work. Basically, it's taking a small portion, out of context, and sending it to the House, in a context that is completely devoid of all the work and analysis that is normally included in reports.
That's why Mr. Fergus—