Therein lies the rub. We’re told that it’s impossible to move forward, and that’s where this kind of breach of trust comes in.
The Prime Minister’s habit of being rather lax when it comes to ethics doesn’t necessarily mean he is guilty. That’s not the case at all. However, it does leave room for doubt. That doubt is compounded by others that arise in public and parliamentary life. That’s what I’m trying to understand.
What can the committee do to dispel the doubt, which, you know as well as I do, persists?
Can you give us any information or documents that would enable us to dispel this doubt?