I certainly don't see it in my part of the world; I assure you.
In your brief you say, “Bills C-38 and C-45 work to improve regulatory efficiency” and “responsible environmental” performance.
Those were the bills that gutted the Fisheries Act and repealed the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and replaced it with a very pale imitation of the statute that was repealed.
What are you proposing when you say that the full benefits require “effective and efficient...regulations and policy” that are “implemented on an aligned 'whole of government' and timely basis”?
Can you explain what you mean by that?