I'll give you an example that is close to my heart. I was at Justice for 20-some years. I'm now someone who is not a Justice lawyer but is rather working in PCO. My job as counsel to the clerk is to challenge the views that Justice brings to the table, just to see whether they are what we think they ought to be.
This goes back to how lawyers operate, frankly. We like to have a debate, because out of the debate comes, we think, the best solution. That's the challenge function at its best—ask questions. What do you mean by that? Have you covered that angle? Are we in agreement with this? Once everybody is in agreement, we happen to think It has to be something that is pretty good.
Is it perfect? Never. But at least we have satisfied ourselves that we have elevated the debate to the level of having the kind of discussion that produces good, sound policy, which we then bring before Parliament in the hope that you will agree with us.