We're waiting for the experts to finalize their report and we'll make a decision in due course.
Let me just address your statements before your question. You said that the Liberals, once they addressed the deficit, were now going to address the real estate deficit. I'd like to believe you, and I think you probably believe this, but then that doesn't explain why Mr. Brison wanted to sell 372 buildings two summers ago.
He issued the mother of all RFPs. When I leave this place, whenever I leave, I'm going to take it back with me, because this is something you should read. It is the most confusing document I have ever seen in my life. At the end, what it wanted to do was basically put those 370 buildings into a real estate income trust. It is very confusing to me when you tell me that your government, or the party you belong to, was going to address the real estate deficit, but Mr. Brison, who held this position, wanted to spin off 372 buildings into a real estate income trust.
Having said that, I totally disagree with the premise that you're bringing about with respect to a sale-leaseback. In a sale-leaseback, if you negotiate a good lease... Again, I'm not saying we're going to do this, but if you negotiate a good lease —