No, I wouldn't. I think it would be unfair to the folks in the department to suggest that they were just randomly choosing buildings. When you're building--for example, Burrard--a brand new building, as you're putting it up it's much easier to insist on LEED gold standards. The Bel-Air building in Montreal was being changed to accommodate a new federal tenant, so we used the opportunity while investing in the building to bring that building up to speed in terms of our LEED gold standards.
We use these opportunities, and as I said earlier, when we're facing a situation where we actually have to take people out of the building...because it's difficult to modernize a building when you have occupants in the building. If you think of your own home, if you're doing major renovation it's most likely you'll have to move out for a while. So when we take people out of buildings, that's when we can actually give this the LEED gold standard, but if we're just doing...not superficial, but less significant types of investments, then obviously we don't have the opportunity to affect the eco-friendliness of the building as much as if we were doing a complete revamp.