I would also like to ask a couple of questions about the real estate. Of course it was in the news, and certainly buildings that have been neglected are not good for the environment. They are not good working conditions for the people who are there. There may in fact be, and I am sure there are, cases in which it makes absolute sense to dispose of certain properties.
There was one media report by a person from the Schulich School of Business who said the sale and leaseback deal will almost certainly increase costs for taxpayers: “On the face of it, it looks good--the government is going to get $1.5 billion, but you don't make money out of nothing. In the end, it's going to cost them more.” How would you respond to that media criticism of the leaseback proposal?