No, we haven't, but we would oppose this bill even if it had minimal impact, because it's a slippery slope. It's setting a dangerous precedent. It's bad public policy, period. In essence, it pre-selects or makes a predetermination as to what ought to be the preferred building materials on a project and takes that decision out of the hands of the design professionals and experienced builders in those situations.
I cannot stress this enough: we would be here regardless of what material was being preferred. The material is immaterial in this situation. The impact, whether it's significant or not on the marketplace, is not the issue. It could establish a dangerous precedent; it's a slippery slope.