Evidence of meeting #130 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was subcommittee.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Yves Giroux  Parliamentary Budget Officer, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Chris Matier  Senior Advisor, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Jill Giswold  Senior Analyst, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Green is fully within his rights to move a motion without notice during committee business. I want to just ask, though, if that motion can be distributed for ease and convenience in the two official languages.

It's very useful for me to be able to read the French version too.

Okay, it's being distributed. Thank you very much, Mr. Green.

I wonder, Chair, if it would make sense to suspend for the vote and then come back to conclude or to continue, in any event, on Mr. Green's motion. That will give us both time to vote and time to have a look at it.

12:50 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I think we moved UC on how we're to deal with it

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

We're going to continue until five minutes out.

If you wish, we can continue debate on this.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Until we're five minutes out will be until when?

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

The vote is in 11 minutes, so we have about—

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

We have six minutes.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

We will be done here in seven minutes.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Do we want to have a two-minute suspension?

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

If you wish, why don't we continue? Do you want to suspend to discuss this? Do you want to suspend—

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

I'm just—

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I'm not keen on suspending and then coming back after the vote.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

I have a point of order.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

I will just share some reflections on the concept then—

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I'm sorry. There is a point of order.

Go ahead, Mr. Lawrence.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

Just for clarity, Mr. Chair, I believe that, when you give UC for the bells, you can withdraw it at any time.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Thanks.

Go ahead, Mr. Genuis.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Let me just start by proposing one amendment that I think will clarify one piece of the motion.

I'd like to propose that we add the word “or” after 106(4). With this amendment, I guess, Chair, this would read:

That, as per the usual practice of House of Commons standing committees, the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates shall not meet during Parliament’s summer recess unless the requirements of s.106(4) or of the Standing Orders are met.

Standing Order 106(4) is one mechanism by which there could be the summoning of a summer meeting, but there are, I think, other Standing Orders or other provisions under which there could be special meetings called as well.

I think in the “s.106(4)”, the “s.” clearly refers to the standing order. Otherwise, the motion would be redundant. It would be unless the requirements of Standing Order 106(4) of the Standing Orders are met, and clearly Standing Order 106(4) is part of the Standing Orders.

It seems to me that having the “or” in there clarifies that, if there are any Standing Orders that would provide for there being a summer meeting.... I mean, there are various situations that could occur. Of course, notionally, the House could even be recalled in the middle of the summer. There could be urgent legislation that is referred to this committee in the middle of the summer, and I do think—

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Let me just interrupt to clarify so the clerk can keep track. It's “unless the requirements of s.106(4) or—

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

It's “or of the Standing Orders”.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Okay. Continue, please.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

While we're talking, Chair, I will even send that in writing to the clerk to make it a little easier. I want to be very respectful of the two languages.

12:55 p.m.

An hon. member

[Inaudible—Editor]

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Can we let Mr. Genuis continue with the floor?

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

I do want to say I take it a bit personally that Mr. Green doesn't want us to get together in the middle of the summer.

1 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Spend time with your kids, man.