I have a message for my Conservative colleagues, if I may, Mr. Chair. It's clear from their amendment that they feel it's important to include a definition of political interference. The idea behind our amendments is the same. We are just going about it in different ways. They are proposing prescribing the definition in the regulations, whereas our amendment is more in line with what the witnesses recommended.
I'm trying to wrap my head around this. The Liberals argued that including a proper definition of political interference in the act was a problem because it would create discrepancies with all kinds of acts. The next time around, they said that it was possible to have two different definitions, that it was fine as long as the government came up with the definition. I'm not attacking anyone; I'm just being logical.