This is what G-3 would sound like. I'll start in the English:
That Bill C-290, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 10 to 31 on page 2, with the following:
(4) The definition “reprisal” in subsection 2(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
“reprisal” means any listed measure taken against a public servant because the public servant
We would have a new (a), which corresponds with NDP-3:
(a) has refused to commit a wrongdoing
Then we go back, so (a) becomes (b) and so on:
(b) has made a protected disclosure
Is it so far so good?