Thank you very much for the question.
In comparing the two, I have to agree with Mr. Fergus: the definition found in paragraph (d) is very broad. Working conditions, for example, can include any psychological, health, or wellness element of work. Whether that narrows or broadens the scope of the act depends on how it is interpreted by the commissioner and, subsequently, the courts. I would say it would have both effects, unfortunately, but I think the current definition is indeed very broad.
Ms. Stevens, would you like to add anything?