I will do that. Maybe I had the mike too low.
Basically, on NDP-11, there are no additional funds required. It allows whistle-blowers direct access to the tribunal without any prior determination by the commissioner.
Before approaching the tribunal, the whistle-blower is required to wait for an indefinite period, while continuing to suffer reprisals, until the commissioner investigates the complaint of reprisal and renders a decision. With this amendment, the whistle-blower could immediately approach the tribunal upon experiencing reprisals.
This would reduce the delay before justice is done and reduce the harm done in the meantime. I just want to point out that throughout the expert testimony this was a best practice, and it has not resulted in sudden jumps in the number of cases in any jurisdictions where it's been adopted.