Thank you very much for the question.
As was mentioned earlier, this is really the clause that binds all the others together. Basically, it ends up changing the role of the Commissioner, in the sense that individuals will no longer have to go through this process and will be able to appeal directly to the tribunal. As a result, when there are reprisals, the Commissioner's role won't be as strong. They will not be able to make a decision in those circumstances.
That's the main consideration, in addition to the ones mentioned by Mr. Fergus, that the legal criteria are higher for the tribunal than for the Commissioner.
I don't know if Ms. Stevens wants to add anything.