Okay. I think I understand better. I'm the critic for national defence. We've been working a lot with the issue and challenges of ill and injured soldiers. I think there's a clear recognition that the causes of operational stress injury are experiences the members have when they're out on operations. You can say there's a complex set of health challenges that come from that, but there is a trauma-related injury. So I heard that also from Ms. Hopkins—trauma informed. In understanding that this is a mental injury, perhaps, that occurred for the forces members, we are also recognizing that there are, in a way, those trauma-related mental injuries that may have occurred from abuse and trauma experienced by aboriginal peoples. I was thinking about the correlation there.
I do have another question that also comes from the concerns we have in the national defence committee. Some of the roles for experts to support the injured forces members have just not been put in place. Even the numbers that were identified by health experts in 2003, we're still almost 60 experts short.
When you're talking about community-based services and services driven by communities—comprehensive mental wellness approach—is there a challenge of not being able to have the medical expertise that's needed? Is it a recruitment problem? Is it a possible hiring freeze problem? It turns out in National Defence the 2010 hiring freeze is now being identified as one of the key reasons that 50 positions haven't been filled, even though there are people available to fill them. Are those same kinds of challenges occurring on the ground?