My understanding of things is that the amendment is already redundant because intent is already required in the offence related to the prohibition.
Is that correct, Mr. Morin?
On October 18th, 2018. See this statement in context.
October 18th, 2018 / 9:50 a.m.
Liberal
David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC
My understanding of things is that the amendment is already redundant because intent is already required in the offence related to the prohibition.
Is that correct, Mr. Morin?
See context to find out what was said next.