Sure. I'll read the English version of it. So (f) would read:
Any other matters the committee deems pertinent to voting reform, including the option for a national referendum in order for Canadians to have the opportunity to approve any proposed changes to Canada's democratic system.
Really, the only change is that the word “need” becomes the word “option”.
To Mrs. Vecchio's point, if this isn't imposing some kind of a condition or a mandatory element to the process, then I think it's an option, and that better reflects what the intention of it was based on the conversation. I don't know why anyone would be opposed to that.