Thank you for your question.
I'm going to cover the parliamentary privilege aspect. Then my colleagues can provide you with more details on the mandate of the House of Commons Administration as it pertains to our IT infrastructure.
With respect to parliamentary privilege, the Speaker of the House of Commons acknowledged the situation in that decision. We're talking about acts of interference and threats made against a member of Parliament related to his parliamentary duties. The Speaker ruled that this constituted a prima facia question of privilege, even though the attack involved the personal email of the member in question.
As you said, there's a potential risk of threats and all kinds of acts of interference, even if the member's personal tools are used. However, in the context of parliamentary duties, the mandate and capacity of the House of Commons administration are limited as to the instruments that may be deployed.
Mr. Aubé, do you have any comments that you would like to add?