This is a debate we had in 2016 and 2017, when the bill to create NSICOP was before Parliament. The chair will remember some of those discussions. The same argument was made that opposition members couldn't be part of this committee, because they couldn't then be opposition members. We said, well, they make it work in the United States, and they make it work in the United Kingdom, in Germany and in France. There is a way to do that.
I think the only thing that you would be expected to keep silent about is the factoids of specific intelligence that you were made aware of, but you could make arguments, you could be critical, you could make proposals and you would not be silenced in your role as opposition. I think, furthermore, if you became aware, through intelligence sources, that a media story had been planted by a foreign intelligence service as a disinformation campaign, and you decided to be a bit more circumspect and not run with it, isn't that a good thing?