I have two questions on that, and I'd like to speak on it.
I like the idea of saying that you have the minister at one meeting and witnesses at the other meeting, and then the committee can decide if they want to go beyond that. So you have two meetings.
Secondly, I'm wondering why the meetings are placed on a Monday as opposed to our regular meeting days, which are on Tuesday. We had set up an agenda of where we're going through with certain priorities, and if we have new things coming in, we either push back those priorities or take this and put it behind. So my sense would have been, why not proceed on a Tuesday and two meetings? If you want to do it sooner than later, depending on the availability of the minister—which would be another issue, I guess—you'd have two meetings arranged in the next reasonable while, bearing in mind the minister's schedule and what else we're doing.
I think it should be two meetings, and just push everything back and deal with this issue if you want to. But do we need to have a Monday meeting?