I think that's right.
Without trying to get drawn into a conversation about what happened in 2002, some pretty significant questions would need to be answered before there could be a coherent implementation of the RAD in terms of who's eligible. Committee members need to be fully aware of the implications of the absence of transitional measures and an instantaneous backlog of an additional 40,000 people. That's, I think, our estimate of the potential number of people who might apply if there are no traditional transitional provisions, in terms of who's eligible to apply, in terms of decisions that have been made two or three or four or five years ago.
That's one example. Our colleagues from the IRB can better talk to you about the implications that would have for them.
The other piece of this is, just to reiterate, that all the assumptions on lead time, which are the subject of some debate, are all premised on assuming there is no backlog and the IRB is ready to go. They can talk more about the implications of that, but the consequences for implementing a decision without the appropriate structures in place are pretty significant, I think.