Thank you, Madam Chair.
This is very complicated stuff and, in my simplistic mind, I just want to understand. The way I understand this is that the original wording in Senator Martin's bill, under her subclauses 1(1) and 1(2) is being replaced by these words, essentially to accomplish what she was trying to accomplish, but with wording that the government and the government lawyers are more comfortable with. Is that a fair characterization of this?