Thank you for the question.
I think it's important to understand what type of body this bill intends to create under the Societies Act, versus a government-structured body that would demand order in council appointments, versus a not-for-profit society, which, most often, chooses among itself once an entity is created.
That's why the interim board is so important. It's why the composition of that board is so important to what will ultimately become of this particular body in this legislation. It's because, aside from reporting to a minister annually with an annual report, there will not be oversight of this or any other parliamentary group on this body the way there might be in other pieces of legislation or other paths to reconciliation that we have.
It's very important to get it right the first time. We aren't necessarily opposed to a particular body being composed under the Societies Act, but as ITK, we want to be partners in the process in a much more robust way than perhaps appears in the interim body, which is largely composed of ministerial selections.