I would love to see that. I think we see that in the amendments, with the different types of classes. We have the seven classes of potential impacts. I think there's recognition in that. There are different levels of harm that can exist within that. I would definitely recommend adding something almost like a matrix—to say that you have these different types of impacts that could occur in hiring or health, and these are the different types of harms that could exist, so therefore these are the mitigations needed. Most importantly, it's about matching that to industry-developed standards.
One thing that Bianca was referencing—and other witnesses have too—is the need for increased public participation in this process. Standards development processes do allow for that and accommodate that. That's why I think this is really important.
Again, it's recognizing that we're not going to be able to put everything in black and white in any sort of legislation. Having people trained to understand what those harms are, and how to look for them and mitigate them, is the point of having somebody responsible, like a chief AI officer.