Just to pull in an analogy from my area of work, under international and humanitarian law there's article 36 that asks for a weapons review. It talks about the review of weapons and of the means and methods of warfare, and that review has to take place before to ensure that the weapon, the means and methods can, in fact, be used in accordance with international humanitarian law.
Having heard what others have spoken to this morning, I do think that there is a means by which to provide the clarity that is needed and the instruction to those who are concerned, and that there is a possibility. We have that currently in Canada's legislative system, so I think there is a means by which that clarity and instruction can be given, just to use that comparison.