I would like to raise a few small points. There was a question about whether the Canadian legislation will be sufficient. First, it will certainly help, but it won't be enough, given the other legislative orders that must be taken into account. The provinces have a role to play in this regard. In fact, as we speak, Quebec is launching its recommendations report on regulating artificial intelligence, entitled “Prêt pour l'IA”. The Government of Quebec has mandated the Conseil de l'innovation du Québec to propose regulatory options, so we have to consider that the Canadian legislation will be part of a broader set of initiatives that will help solidify the guarantees and protect us well.
As for the United States, it's difficult to predict which way it will go next. However, President Biden's executive order was a signal of a magnitude few expected. So it's a good move then, and one to watch.
Your question touches a bit on the really important issue of interoperability. How will Canada align with the European Union, the United States and others?
As for the European case, the final text of the legislation was published last week. Since it's 300 pages long, I don't have all the details; however, I will tell you that we certainly have to think about it, so as not to penalize our companies. In other words, we really need to know how our legislation and Canadians are going to align with it, to a certain extent.
Furthermore, one of the questions I have right off the bat is this. European legislation is more focused on high‑risk AI systems, and their legal framework deals more with risk, while ours deals more with impact. How can the two really work together? This is something that needs more thought.