We believe that the current protection provided by AIDA doesn't go far enough. To reiterate the comment made by my colleague, Marie-Julie Desrochers, it's not sufficient in terms of transparency.
Specifically—to give an example about generative AI—there is the fact that there currently is an absence with regard to authorizations from rights holders to use data for mining, for exploitation. The output cannot be protected by copyright. At least there is a consensus that these outputs are problematic because we have no knowledge of which data were used. It creates an issue for creators—for example, for DGC members—whenever they use or would like to use an AI output, but also for all Canadians, we believe, and—