Just to clarify the government position, we don't disagree with wanting to protect the best interests of the child. That's exactly what we want to do. The intention there is pure and the right one to have. However, with respect to the mechanism through which to do that within the language of the bill, it seems to me there may be some challenges with embedding the best interests as wording in the preamble of the bill. Doing that may cause some challenges later on because, of course, we will have to debate the substance of the bill later.
Whether we decide to go with best interests or the capability test, which I think is what we intend to propose at some point, can you outline for me why there are challenges around embedding best interests in the language of the bill? I'm talking not just about the preamble, because I think there's an implication here. If we embed it in the preamble and then later on that term is not used in the bill itself, I think that creates interpretive problems.