We had some lawyers appear for the bill in general. With regard to another aspect of it, when we were discussing the terminology of “legitimate interests” and those things, they said that there was case law around that definition, not in Canada but in other countries, that courts would turn to as well in looking at this.
MP Vis went through the law and presumably case law in other countries around the best interests of the child. Doesn't that help already in guiding the corporate legal counsel advising people, like I was in the marketing field in large corporations, on what we should and should not do, whether you have an internal privacy watchdog or not within the company? It doesn't have to be just Canadian case law, does it, in order to provide a definition for “best interests of the child”?