Depending on the decisions that this committee makes and how it's structured, I think there would be some potential challenges in terms of the implementability of CPC-9 as it's structured now, including with regard to part 2 of the bill. I think there would probably need to be several.... We would need to take some time to go through it again to see what the....
I think what you're asking is what the default would be if the tribunal is removed. I think that there are issues of principle as well as of implementation that could arise. On the principles point, there's a principle of natural justice and administrative fairness that I think needs to be managed. I think you could still imagine a scenario in which we move through the federal courts and the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, which is kind of what we mentioned earlier.
You would end up in a situation that is roughly analogous to today's, in that the decisions could be appealed. Each appeal would be a de novo proceeding. Each appeal would have to review the basis of fact to begin. That is going to be a more lengthy, drawn-out, challenging process than the one that would be undertaken under a tribunal system.