That's a very good question, and on the artists, I would agree.
By providing a framework, the way Canada has been doing it, if you think of PIPEDA, the existing law that deals with privacy, it's quite something what we have achieved. It's still relevant 20 years after it was passed, even though things have evolved. As I said, we didn't have Twitter and we didn't have Facebook at that time. The same philosophy has been applied here.
You can be very prescriptive. Some jurisdictions have decided to do that, but the risk, as you said, is that you become obsolete, not the month after but maybe within five years' time. Our approach has been to say, as we did with PIPEDA, that it's better to have a framework with guidelines and broad principles. Then, through regulation and codes, you can evolve with the technology.
Like you, I don't know what might be coming six months down the road or even five years down the road, but one thing I know is that you have a chance probably only once every decade to update these things. They need to be relevant for the long term. That's the philosophical approach that Canada has been taking. That's why our partners around the world are so interested in what we're doing.