Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
And thanks to all three of you for your presentations. They are by far the best presentations we've heard so far today.
I have lots of questions. What I'll do is start off with Mr. Feldman and then go back to Mr. Parent and Mr. Rivard afterwards.
We've clarified the legal cases, Mr. Feldman. Both Mr. Johnson and Mr. Wilson admitted there are no further appeals. We're looking at two last hurdles for final victory. And I think we've clarified the termination clause. We've gone from seven years firm to 23 months firm to 18 months firm.
I'm interested in how you perceive clause 34 being used, potentially, which gives the right to the United States to terminate the agreement without further recourse to any other criteria.
I'd also like you to respond briefly to Mr. Johnson's comments. He said something about its being two or three years before we would get any repayment if we actually do the right thing, which is to get over those last two hurdles and win those victories. I'd like to hear your feedback on whether you believe that is in any way real or whether it is exaggerated, as the litigation situation was.
May I have just brief replies, please, because I'd like to come back to you.